General Electric Company v. Johnson
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff General Electric Company (“GE” or “plaintiff’) has brought a broad constitutional challenge to section 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. GE seeks a declaratory judgment that section 106, 42 U.S.C. § 9606, in tandem with sections 107(c)(3) and 113(h), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(c)(3), 9613(h), creates a regime that violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Am. Compl. at ¶ 1. Presently before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Rahman v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.