Legal Opinion

General Electric Company v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2005No. CIV.A. 00-2855(JDB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff General Electric Company (“GE” or “plaintiff’) has brought a broad constitutional challenge to section 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. GE seeks a declaratory judgment that section 106, 42 U.S.C. § 9606, in tandem with sections 107(c)(3) and 113(h), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(c)(3), 9613(h), creates a regime that violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Am. Compl. at ¶ 1. Presently before the Court is the motion for summary judgment of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. General Electric Co. v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. Rahman v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API