Legal Opinion

Raytheon Aircraft Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 26, 2006No. 05-2328-JWLPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Raytheon Aircraft Company filed suit against the United States of America under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) seeking cost recovery or contribution from the Army Corps of Engineers as a liable party. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment that the provisions of CERCLA governing the unilateral administrative order regime are unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

This matter is presently before the court on the United States’ motion to dismiss or, in…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. North American Galvanizing & Coatings, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. City of Rialto v. West Coast Loading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. City of Bangor v. CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
  4. American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ross Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API