Landmark National Bank v. Kesler
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
Landmark National Bank brought a suit to foreclose its mortgage against Boyd Kesler and joined Millennia Mortgage Corp. as a defendant because a second mortgage had been filed of record for a loan between Kesler and Millennia. In a foreclosure suit, it is normal practice to name as defendants all parties who may claim a Hen against the property. When neither Kesler nor Millennia responded to the suit, the district court gave Landmark a default judgment, entered a journal entry foreclosing Landmark’s mortgage, and ordered the property sold so that sale proceeds could be applied to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Merscorp., Inc. v. RomaineNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Cisco v. Van LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In Re the Appeal of Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Landmark National Bank v. KeslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Vawter v. Quality Loan Service Corp. of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. HowieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Bucci v. Lehman Brothers BankSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.