Legal Opinion

Cisco v. Van Lew

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1943No. Civ. 3226PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Cisco brought this action to compel defendant and respondent to specifically perform an alleged agreement to sell certain real property. Joined in the same complaint as a party plaintiff, appellant McGuire, in a second cause of action, seeks to recover a real estate broker’s commission of $100 on the same transaction.

In November, 1941, the defendant was the owner of the real property in question. She listed it with McGuire for sale, giving him an exclusive listing, reciting that the sale price thereof should be $2,500, payable $500 down and $25 per month thereafter.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Schuh Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Pacific Vinegar & Pickle Works v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Irvmor Corp. v. RodewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Burke v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Edna Jackson v. Syd Grant, Belle G. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Warren A. Ott, and Mortgage Services of Norfolk, Inc., a Corporation v. Home Savings & Loan Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API