Legal Opinion
Consolidated Industries , Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 4, 1999No. 98-5167PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges a decision of the Court of Federal Claims that upheld a contracting officer’s default termination of the appellant Consolidated Industries, Inc. (“Consolidated”)^ government contract for failure to meet the contractual delivery schedules. We affirm.
I
The pertinent facts, as set forth in the opinion of the Court of Federal Claims and in the record, are undisputed.
In March 1988 Consolidated entered into a contract with the Army to produce battery assemblies for an anti-tank weapons system. The contract had been set aside for a small business…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross and General Dynamics Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Nathaniel H. Kolmes and Harold F. Plemmons v. World Fibers Corporation, and World Elastic Corporation, Dean R. Andrews and Gregory v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Darwin Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Churchill Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Beard v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pinckney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- O'Connor v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Lanterman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.