Legal Opinion

Fortuna v. Zoning Board of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1948No. 3749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, C. J.

The defendant, Manchester Buick Company, owns a garage on the northerly side of Hanover Street in said Manchester, to which it proposes to build an addition. Its building and automobile business were in existence prior to the passage of the Manchester zoning ordinance in 1927. The building is located in an apartment house district. Section 4 of the zoning ordinance of the city of Manchester provides as follows: ‘ ‘Section 4. In an Apartment House District — No building or premises shall be erected, altered or used except for one or more of the following uses.” Then follows a list of permitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanover Precinct v. AtkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  2. Vogel v. Board C of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Plourde v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Vannah v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Lovely v. Zoning Bd. of App. of City of Presque IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API