Plourde v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.
The findings of the Court are amply supported by and fully justified on the evidence. See Sundeen v. Rogers, 83 N. H. 253; Stone v. Cray, 89 N. H. 483; Vogel v. Board &c. of Manchester, 92 N. H. 195. It certainly cannot be said that no reasonable person could have reached such a conclusion. It would almost seem the contrary should be true; to wit, that no reasonable person would have reached a different conclusion.
Plaintiff’s exception to the denial of his motion to further amend his bill after the filing of the Court’s findings and rulings avails him nothing. It was within the discretion of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stone v. CraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Sundeen v. RogersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Vogel v. Board C of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fortuna v. Zoning Board of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948