Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Vicchiarelli

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 24, 1993No. Civ. 93-479 (SSB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The issue pending before me today involves the application of New Jersey’s Rule of Professional Conduct 3.7 (hereinafter RPC 3.7). The Defendant moves to disqualify Plaintiffs counsel, Mr. Alan Lands, because it is likely that Mr. Lands will testify at trial. Having considered the written submissions and oral arguments of the parties and for the reasons discussed below, the Defendant’s motion must be granted.

I. Procedural and Factual Background

Mr. Freeman filed a complaint for malicious prosecution and infringement of his constitutional right to due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class ActionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. United States v. Frank G. PrantilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. United States v. Isaac FogelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. People v. HagosColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Main Events Productions, LLC v. LacyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  4. DiMartino v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Host Marriott Corp. v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API