Legal Opinion
In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class Action
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 6, 2004PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
The primary issue on this appeal is whether this Court should reverse the certification of a state-wide class of approximately 7,500 purchasers of 1981 Cadillac automobiles with V8-6-4 engines. This matter involves six consolidated actions in which Adrian I. Karp, P.A. (Karp, P.A.), a professional corporation through which Adrian Karp (Karp) practices law, appears as co-counsel for all plaintiffs. Karp, P.A. also appears as a representative class member. Plaintiffs claim that the 1981 Cadillacs contained common design defects and that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- In Re Northern District of California, Dalkon Shield Iud Products Liability Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.