Legal Opinion

DiMartino v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2003No. 40923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for a writ of mandamus questions whether the district court acted arbitrarily and capriciously by disqualifying petitioner Mark DiMartino’s counsel, Michael H. Singer, under SCR 178. Having reviewed the petition and the answer filed by real party in interest Michael Greenstein, we conclude that SCR 178 may prevent Singer from representing DiMartino at trial, if the underlying action proceeds to trial, but it does not otherwise disqualify him from representing DiMartino.

According to the documents before us, the underlying action is primarily a breach of contract…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Culebras Enterprises Corporation v. Miguel A. Rivera-RiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. World Youth Day, Inc. v. Famous Artists Merchandising Exchange, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. Cronin v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Zurich Insurance Co. v. KnottsKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Robert Droste Claudia Droste v. Douglas JulienCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Liapis v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Williams v. Borden Chemical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
  5. Green v. Moog Music, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API