Blaylock v. City of Philadelphia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal arises out of a case in which Andre Blaylock sued five officers of the Philadelphia Police Department under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging false arrest, excessive force, and malicious prosecution. At the close of discovery, the officers moved for summary judgment, arguing, inter alia, that they were entitled to qualified immunity. The District Court denied that motion, and the officers now appeal.
*407We lack the benefit of the District Court’s views as to what facts are subject to genuine dispute with respect to the claims of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Barkes Ex Rel. Barkes v. First Correctional Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Shawn Eagan v. Michael DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Bishop v. HackelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- George v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.