Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Hackel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 1, 2011No. 09-1791PublishedCited by 450 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee Russell A. Bishop filed a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against various personnel at the Macomb County Jail, alleging that he suffered sexual abuse by another inmate as a result of their deliberate indifference to his safety needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The jail personnel sought summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. The district court denied the motion as to defendants-appellants Deputy James Stanley, Deputy John Cantea, Deputy Scott Anderman, and Deputy Harrell. The Deputies filed this interlocutory…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by450 opinions
- Lemire v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Michele Rafferty v. Trumbull Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.