Legal Opinion

Owen v. Burcham

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1979No. 12846PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs-respondents for the wrongful death of their son resulting from a motor vehicle-bicycle accident. We affirm.

Defendants-appellants first assign error to the refusal of the trial court to give certain requested instructions. The substance of the defendants’ proposed instructions was adequately covered elsewhere and, hence, the trial court did not err in refusing defendants’ proposed instructions. E. g., Meissner v. Smith, 94 Idaho 563, 494 P.2d 567 (1972).

Appellants’ next assignment of error relates to the trial court’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mann v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Willace Bridges and Wife, Ruby Bridges v. Groendyke Transport, Inc. And Frank GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Meissner v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Lanham v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kozlowski v. RushIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API