Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Hulett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 3, 1921, which affirmed a decree of the St. Lawrence County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of the administrators of the estate of Ert H. Dollar, deceased, and directing the appellant herein, an attorney, to pay over to said administrator a sum of money collected by him and belonging to said estate.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 3, 1921, which affirmed a decree of the St. Lawrence County Surrogate’s Court judicially settling the accounts of the administrators of the estate of Ert H. Dollar, deceased, and directing the appellant herein, an attorney, to pay over to said administrator a sum of money collected by him and belonging to said estate. Appellant, as attorney for said administrators,- had collected various sums of money due the estate on notes and accounts, part of which he refused to pay over…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  2. In re the Estate of BalazsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of LiellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In Re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API