Legal Opinion · Dissent
In Re the Estate of Rosenberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1934Published
1DissentCrane, J.
This application to the Surrogate is in essence an application to recover and get back assets of the estate in the hands of an attorney. It has taken the form of a motion under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act:
“ Compensation of attorneys. At any time during the administration of an estate, and irrespective of the pendency of a particular proceeding, the surrogate shall have power to hear an application for and to fix and determine the compensation of an attorney for services rendered to an estate or to its representative, or to a devisee, legatee, distributee or any person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schell v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Matter of AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re BuckenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Matter of JeffriesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In Re the Accounting of HulettNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.