King v. the Jewish Home
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} In one assignment of error, plaintiff-appellant Mary King appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Cedar Village. We affirm.
{¶ 2} King had been employed by Cedar Village as a nursing assistant. Following a work-related injury, King’s physician, Dr. Leroy Vickers, informed Cedar Village that King should be placed on light-duty work. King, who is African-American, claimed that Cedar Village instead assigned her to regular-duty work and that she had been denied light-duty work based on her race. King hired an attorney who contacted Cedar Village on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- James P. Smith v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Hollingsworth v. Time Warner CableOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Harris v. OHNH EMP, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jaber v. FirstMerit Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Mattessich v. Weathersfield Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- DeLong v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.