Legal Opinion

King v. the Jewish Home

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2008No. C-070833PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In one assignment of error, plaintiff-appellant Mary King appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Cedar Village. We affirm.

{¶ 2} King had been employed by Cedar Village as a nursing assistant. Following a work-related injury, King’s physician, Dr. Leroy Vickers, informed Cedar Village that King should be placed on light-duty work. King, who is African-American, claimed that Cedar Village instead assigned her to regular-duty work and that she had been denied light-duty work based on her race. King hired an attorney who contacted Cedar Village on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. James P. Smith v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hollingsworth v. Time Warner CableOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Onderko v. Sierra Lobo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Harris v. OHNH EMP, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Jaber v. FirstMerit Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Mattessich v. Weathersfield Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. DeLong v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API