Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. Time Warner Cable
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 2006No. Nos. C-050549, C-050859, C-050873, C-050940 and C-050944PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} In this wrongful-termination case, we affirm the jury verdict. We affirm all of the trial court’s rulings on posttrial motions, with one exception — we reinstate the original award of attorney fees.
{¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant, Patti Hollingsworth, was fired by her former employer, defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, Time Warner Cable. Hollingsworth had worked for Time Warner since 1989 and was an audit coordinator when she was fired in 2002. In her last few months of employment, Hollingsworth had suffered from chronic sinusitis, entitling…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. GrimsleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Edlong Corp. v. NadathurOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wynn v. Gilbert, C-060457 (6-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Potts v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Kassay v. Niederst Mgmt., Ltd., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.