Matter of Botsford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
The parents contend the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter of the juvenile’s custody and that therefore the consent order transferring custody to the grandmother was void. They argue that since the juvenile’s grandmother never submitted to the court the informational affidavit required in custody actions by G.S. 50A-9, the court never obtained jurisdiction over the matter. This argument is without merit. The court acquired jurisdiction over the juvenile pursuant to G.S. 7A-523 when the juvenile was alleged to be delinquent. In exercising its jurisdiction, the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Steadman v. Town of PinetopsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Browning v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nunnery v. BaucomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Collins v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Asad v. AsadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Harmon v. Ball-Incon Glass Pkg.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005
- Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.