Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1994No. 9318SC790Published

1Dissent

Judge WYNN

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the sheriff in this case did not neglect to serve process as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 4(h). In view of the legislature’s command in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.4(b) that the “father and mother shall be primarily liable for the support of a minor child,” I conclude that the General Assembly did not intend Rule 4(h) to be a bar to mothers who are attempting to serve fathers who fail to pay child support.

I agree with the majority that the correct definition for “neglect” as it is used in Rule 4(h) is “to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re BiggersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API