Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Ferrin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1986No. 85-381PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues presented for review are whether Florida or Ohio law applies and then, whether under the applicable law, Ferrin was using the tractor with permission at the time of the accident. For the reasons to follow we hold for appellees and affirm the appellate court below.

I

It is well-settled in Ohio that in cases involving a contract, the law of the state where the contract is made governs interpretation of the contract. Garlick v. McFarland (1953), 159 Ohio St. 539, 545 [50 O.O. 445]; Switzer v. Carroll (C.A. 6, 1966), 358 F.2d 424, 426. In Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Modell (1984),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. LeonardSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. ModellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Roth v. Old Republic Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Boggs v. Butler Boggs v. WhittleSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Ray v. EarlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Tricia Miller, of the Estate of Rhonda Bishop v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Detrex Chemical Industries, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Keith E. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API