Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Dooley Bros.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 19, 1960No. Nos. 5670, 5686PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
These two cases brought by the Secretary of Labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, involve identical issues and similar facts and should have been heard together. Before we realized this we permitted the Secretary to argue the one later filed first, and the other the following month. We treat them in one opinion. It was agreed that the defendants in both cases failed to meet the act’s requirements for overtime. 29 U.S.C.A. § 207. The only issue is whether the employee or employees in question were “engaged in the production of goods for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Addie Jane Lacey v. The Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Boston, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Dooley Bros., Inc., Herbert Kletjian, D/B/A University Cleaning Co. v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Goldberg v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Douglas v. Citizens Bank of JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.