Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 4, 1960No. 83PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
Once again we are presented with a nice question concerning the scope of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended. 63 Stat. 912, 29 U. S. C. § 207. The respondent, a construction contractor, was engaged by the Lower Nueces River Water Supply District (hereafter to be called the District) to construct a dam and impounding facilities on the lower Nueces River in Texas at a cost of about $6,000,000, in order to increase roughly tenfold the District’s then-existing reservoir capacity. The dam is not a multi-purpose project; its sole purpose is to *311create an expanded reservoir for the District. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Spiegel, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Mitchell Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Sobrinio v. Medical Center Visitor's Lodge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor v. B. B. Saxon Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.