Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 13, 1962No. Civ. A. Nos. 13316, 13420, 13529PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
These three actions instituted by the Secretary of Labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., <(the “Act”) were consolidated and heard together. Civil Action No. 13316 is an action under 29 U.S.C.A. § 217 for an injunction against alleged violation of overtime and record keeping requirements of the Act. Civil Action No. 13420 and Civil Action No. 13529 are wage suits brought under 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(e) at the written request of nineteen employees, to recover alleged underpayment of wages. The Secretary relies upon Mitchell v. Dooley…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wirtz v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Wirtz v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963