In re the Welfare of B.A.H.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Judge.*
On appeal from the order adjudicating him delinquent, appellant argues that, as applied to him, a boy under age 16 who engaged in sexual penetration with his first cousin, also a boy under age 16, Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(g) (2010), violates due process because it encourages arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement and it violates equal protection when only appellant was prosecuted, even though both boys committed first-degree criminal-sexu*434al conduct. Because we find that prosecution of appellant under Minn.Stat. § 609.842, subd. 1(g), violated his rights to due…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Welfare of B.A.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014