Legal Opinion
Stare v. Tate
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1971No. Civ. 38065PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in an action to reform a property settlement agreement with her former husband, the defendant, and to enforce the agreement as reformed.
Facts
The agreement in question was signed by both parties on February 21, 1968. It was the culmination of protracted negotiations which had been going on for several years. Both sides were represented by counsel at all times.
In the negotiations both sides apparently agreed that the community property was to be evenly divided. They did not agree, however, on the value of certain items and on the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wilson v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cleghorn v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- La Mancha Development Corp. v. SheegogCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Stuhley v. Dunoco Development Corp. (In Re Dunoco Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Building Service Employees Pension Trust v. American Building Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.