Legal Opinion

United States v. First Nat. Bank

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided April 4, 1918No. Nos. 2075-2077PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Condemnation proceedings by the United States against the First National Bank and others, against John C. Carter and others, and against A. G. Forbes and others.

1Opinion of the Court

Instructions by

HFNRY D. CLAYTON, District Judge,

to commissioners appointed to assess damages sustained by the owners:

Gentlemen: At the inception of the matters before you, I explained to you the nature of the proceedings under and by virtue of which you were appointed by the court as commissioners, and your duties in respect thereto. I again call your attention to the statutes governing in this case. The act of Congress approved July 2, 1917 (40 Stat. 241, c. 35 [U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1917, p. 363]), provides that the Secretary of War may cause proceedings to be instituted in the name of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. United States v. ForbesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1919
  5. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API