Durr Drug Co. v. Acree
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The primary question in this case is whether the complainant, Durr Drug Company, has come into a court of equity with clean hands. It is the appellant here, and the trial court held that it had no standing in court because of said maxim.
The theory is that it is in the same attitude in this respect as Gertrude A. Tucker who mortgaged the land to it, and is therefore in privity with her, since it is not claiming any rights superior to hers.
The controversy so far as here material is between appellant and Reconstruction Finance Corporation to determine which of them may exercise…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Anders v. SandlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Bank of Orland v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Baird v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Thompson v. Wiik, Reimer & SweetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Spencer v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Pace v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.