Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. Van Antwerp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1941No. 1 Div. 158PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree overruling demurrer to a bill in equity. We will consider separately the contentions of appellant, whereby the decree is claimed to be erroneous.

1. Multifariousness:

It is immaterial whether the approach to this contention is on principles which relate to a misjoinder of parties complainant, or misjoinder of causes of action which is multifariousness. The nature of the contention invokes the principles of multifariousness.

The bill was filed jointly by two parties on allegations of transactions by which each under the same (not similar) facts and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis AwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hudson v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. McCurry v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Dgb, LLC v. Michael HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Smith v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API