Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1928No. 26,640PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion' for judgment or a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages from the defendant for the alleged coercion of plaintiff thereby compelling and forcing plaintiff against its will to agree to and remit to defendant for all checks sent to plaintiff by mail, drawn upon plaintiff bank, without making any exchange charge.

The defendant is a federal reserve bank located at Minneapolis in this state. Plaintiff is a small state bank with a capital of $10,000, located in the village of Hugo about 25 miles from Minneapolis,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Young v. LadeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shanley & Fisher, PC v. SisselmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  2. Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Placek v. EdstromNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ensign v. Home for the Jewish AgedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API