Legal Opinion

Ensign v. Home for the Jewish Aged

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1955No. 22122PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEW, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued to cancel their joint promissory note for $2,500, payable to defendant on demand, on the ground that they executed it under duress. Defendant denied the. plea of duress, pleaded valid consideration and filed the note as a counterclaim. The court found the issues for the defendant on the plaintiffs’ petition and sustained its counterclaim in the amount of $2,500. Plaintiffs have appealed.

It is alleged in the plaintiffs’ petition that defendant is a corporation, doing business as a home for the aged; that it makes certain charges for board and lodging furnished aged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. White v. ScarrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Coleman v. Crescent Insulated Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Weisert v. BrammanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Carrell v. CarrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Aurora Bank v. HamlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API