Ensign v. Home for the Jewish Aged
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DEW, Judge.
Plaintiffs sued to cancel their joint promissory note for $2,500, payable to defendant on demand, on the ground that they executed it under duress. Defendant denied the. plea of duress, pleaded valid consideration and filed the note as a counterclaim. The court found the issues for the defendant on the plaintiffs’ petition and sustained its counterclaim in the amount of $2,500. Plaintiffs have appealed.
It is alleged in the plaintiffs’ petition that defendant is a corporation, doing business as a home for the aged; that it makes certain charges for board and lodging furnished aged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- White v. ScarrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Coleman v. Crescent Insulated Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Weisert v. BrammanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Carrell v. CarrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Aurora Bank v. HamlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.