State ex rel. Young v. Ladeen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Proceedings in quo warranto in this court, brought by the attorney •general to determine who shall constitute the lawful school board of a certain school district. Evidence was taken before a referee, and the •controversy was submitted for determination. Judgment for relator.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Proceedings in quo 'warranto instituted in this court on the information of the attorney general to determine the right of respondents to hold and exercise the offices of chairman, clerk, and treasurer ■of school district No. 17, in Mille Gacs county. Evidence was taken before a referee appointed for the purpose, and, upon his report and the pleadings, the controversy was submitted for determination. The offices of clerk and treasurer only are in dispute. It is conceded that Gilbert Wilkes is the duly qualified and acting chairman of the board. Respondent Sandberg, who, the information…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biddle v. WillardIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- People ex rel. Goodwin v. VoorhisNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by14 opinions
- Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Moreno v. CairnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kramer v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- County of Ventura v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Dosland v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.