Legal Opinion

Prager & Bear, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1977No. Civ. 37523PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

Plaintiff, Prager & Bear, Inc., appeals from a judgment determining that plaintiff should recover nothing against defendant, Federal Insurance Company, in plaintiff’s action for the recovery of inventory losses under a policy of employee fidelity insurance.

Trial was had before the court, sitting without a jury. After the court had rendered its intended decision, plaintiff requested and, at the court’s direction, defendant filed, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. However, plaintiff later withdrew its request, so we do not have the benefit of the trial court’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Paramount Properties Co. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wint v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Meyer Jewelry Co. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Tri-Motors Sales, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Southern Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Jones v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cambridge Trust Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API