Cotner v. Mundy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 1. Error from District Court, Marshall County; Geo. S. March, Judge. Action by A. E. Mundy and Mary MJundy against A. H. Cotner and Southwestern Gravel Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
This suit is by A* E. MJundy and Mary Mundy, husband and wife, to cancel a sand and grave] lease on 80 acres of land in Marshall county, and to quiet title upon the grounds (1) that the lessee had failed to comply with the implied covenant to exercise diligence in the operation of the lease, and (2) that the 80 acres was a part of the homestead and the wife had not joined in the execution of the lease and the same was), therefore, void. Judgment was for the plaintiffs, cancel ing the lease and quieting title, and defend ants appeal.
A number, of errors are. assigned but tbe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Killebrew v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. GilliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Papoose Oil Co. v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fox Petroleum Co. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Crain v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Archer v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Hitt v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.