Legal Opinion

Ruberoid Co. v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1952No. 14473PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAMER, Justice.

This cause had its inception in a contract between Harry Yates as contractor and The Ruberoid Company as owner. Yates agreed to repair and rebuild portions of an above ground concrete water tank located on Ruberoid’s land for a consideration of $9,573.44. Travelers Indemnity Company was surety on the performance bond, with Ruberoid, as well as all subcontractors, workmen, laborers, mechanics and materialmen who worked for, or furnished materials to, Yates in the performance of such contract, as their respective interests might appear, as obligees.

After Yates asserted he had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. A. E. Fullenwider & Co. v. LongmoorTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Campbell v. TeepleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Cramer v. Dallas Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McKnight v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Freeman v. Shannon Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Cox v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Tezel & Cotter v. RoarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Laredo Brick Co. v. UrdialesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API