Legal Opinion
Renko v. McLean
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 30, 1997No. 77, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
In Warren v. Warren, 336 Md. 618, 650 A.2d 252 (1994), and Frye v. Frye, 305 Md. 542, 505 A.2d 826 (1986), this Court declined to create an exception to the parent-child immunity doctrine in motor tort cases based upon the existence of compulsory automobile liability insurance coverage. We are asked in this case to reexamine those decisions. Having done so, we shall reaffirm the vitality of the parent child-immunity doctrine in this State and affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.
I
The facts of this case are brief and undisputed. On December 8,1992,…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Metropolis Theater Company, Plffs. In Err. v. City of Chicago and Ernest J. MagerstadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Allstate Insurance v. Kyong Ho KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Frankel v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.