Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Kyong Ho Kim

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 2003No. 76PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

In its 2001 session, the General Assembly abolished the defense of parent-child immunity in a tort action arising from the operation of a motor vehicle, up to the minimum amount of liability insurance coverage required by Maryland Code, § 17-103(b) of the Transportation Article ($20,000 per person/$40,000 per accident). The law took effect October 1, 2001. The issue in this appeal is whether that law was intended to apply, and lawfully can apply, to an action that was filed after October 1, 2001, but that arose from an accident that occurred prior to that date. In an action for…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Stearman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Prince George's County v. Ray's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API