Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Soley v. Dorrell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1994No. Nos. 93-2182 and 93-2192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Appellee has filed a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. As appellant points out in his motion to strike, such a motion has no place in an appeal. Therefore, we grant the motion to strike. See Civ.R. 1(C)(1). However, we treat the memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss as a brief on the merits.

For a writ of prohibition to issue, a court must find that the respondent is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial authority, that the exercise of such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Judson v. SpahrOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kelley v. State ex rel. GellnerOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Williams Ford Sales, Inc. v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lupo v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Salem v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API