Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams Ford Sales, Inc. v. Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1995No. 94-896PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The board has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis that appellant possesses a plain and adequate remedy at law. However, since this is a timely filed appeal as of right, the board’s dismissal motion is inappropriate. See State ex rel. Soley v. Dorrell (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 514, 515, 634 N.E.2d 215, 216. Therefore, appellant’s motion to strike the board’s dismissal motion is granted. However, the board’s memorandum in support of its motion to dismiss will be treated as a brief on the merits. Id.

*113In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, appellant had the burden to prove a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. RonanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Kaylor v. BrueningOhio Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API