Legal Opinion
St. Denis v. Mullen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 30, 1923No. 23,608PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to cancel certain deeds and to have the plaintiffs adjudged to be the owners of a farm which the deeds purported to convey. There were findings and judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The plaintiff Mary St. Denis and the defendant Gabriel St. Denis were married in the state of New York in 1862. The other plaintiffs are their children. In 1865, after the Civil War in which St. Denis served, they settled in Rice county. In 1875 Mrs. St. Denis took her children and returned to the home of her father in New York.. In 1876, and again in 1881, St. Denis…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Starr v. Long JimSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Alt v. BanholzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Murphy v. RennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stolldorf v. StolldorfWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Village of Wells v. Layne-Minnesota Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Butler Brothers Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Eustice Ex Rel. Eustice v. JewisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Cleys v. CleysCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.