Legal Opinion

Bryant Investment Co. v. Dimmick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1928No. 26,601PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Action to recover damages for alleged gross mismanagement and negligence by defendants, acting as officers of plaintiff corporation, in the conduct of the corporation business. A verdict for defendants was directed at the close of plaintiff’s case. The motion for a directed verdict was made upon the grounds: (1) That there had been no cause of action proved; (2) that no damages had been shown. The appeal is stated to be from the order of the district court denying plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. As a matter of fact the motion was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Baxter v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Dickinson v. Citizens Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Bacon v. Bankers Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API