Legal Opinion

Noble v. City of Bethany

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1951No. 34421PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, V. C. J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court. The plaintiffs alleged, and it was admitted, that they were the *123owners of certain lands located in sec. 4, twp 12 N., range 4 W., Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, and that they had owned the property since 1925; that in August, 1925, a dam was constructed on a stream of water that crossed said land, creating a lake of approximately eight acres. The lake was stocked with fish, and plaintiffs and their families and friends used it for fishing and recreational purposes for a number of years. That the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hadley v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. MeadorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Town of Sentinel v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Burnett v. TisdellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. City of Bethany v. MUNICIPAL SECURITIES COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. City of Ada v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API