Legal Opinion
Miller v. Nichols
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 9, 2009No. 2:08-cv-00355PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (Docket #s 7 & 9) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 26). As explained herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss and, therefore, DENIES as MOOT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Defendant has moved to dismiss all of Plaintiffs’ claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) & (6). Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), a party may move to dismiss a case for lack of subject…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- LaChapelle v. Berkshire Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2014
- Jaron Blue Butler v. Travis John Willey, et al.District Court, D. Maine · 2026
- PORTER v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
- WILMINGTON TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR MFRA TRUST 2015-1 v. HOWEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024