McAbee v. Randall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. When the cause was called for trial in the Court below, the defendant’s attorney moved for judgment on the pleadings. The Court denied the motion; the cause was then tried, and the plaintiff recovered judgment. The defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Wallace, J.:
The appeal here is taken from the final judgment only. There being no statement on appeal, nor bill of exceptions, the record before us for review is limited to such papers as are declared by section two hundred and three to constitute the “judgment roll.” It would seem from the minutes of the trial, which are found in the transcript, and from the argument of counsel, that the real purpose of the appeal from the judgment here taken is to review an order said to have been made by the Court below after the coming on of the cause for trial, by which order a motion of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Haskell v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Shain v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Boscus v. BohligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Starr Piano Co. v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.