Theisen v. Pittmans & Dean Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error'to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by Joseph P. Theisen against Pittmans & Dean Company for damages caused by the maintenance of a horse barn on premises adjoining plaintiff’s property. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
This is an action of trespass on the case in which plaintiff, who was the owner of a house and lot on Baltimore avenue, between Second and Third streets in the city of Detroit, seeks to recover damages from the defendant growing out of the fact that defendant has erected and maintained, on lots immediately adjoining and west of the property owned by plaintiff, a horse barn in which defendant is charged with having stabled upwards of 50 horses. The record discloses that plaintiff bought the property in 1908 for about $5,000 and sold it in 1910 for about $3,350. During the period of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Phelps v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Hoffman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Addison Flouring Mill Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- Marshall v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Luisa Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955