Legal Opinion

Caywood v. Farrell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cass county; the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

James Caywood, as the nominal plaintiff, for the use of certain judgment creditors, garnished the defendant in error." On trial in the circuit court judgment was entered against defendant for §1028.23, which judgment was reversed by the Appellate Court with the following finding of facts: “The court finds that it does not appear from the evidence that the said Felix G. Farrell was indebted in any sum to said James Caywood when the writs of garnishment were issued, nor at any time afterward before the rendition of the judgment in garnishment proceedings,”

The error assigned on the prosecution…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Commercial Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Brown v. City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Tibballs v. LibbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Siddall v. JansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Whittle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Musser v. MusserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Cointe v. Congregation of St. John the BaptistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Marks v. BoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API