Legal Opinion

Fitz v. Board of Education of the Port Huron Area Schools

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 3, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-9730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.

In the case presently before the Court, the plaintiff sued alleging that the defendant violated 38 U.S.C. § 2021 by refusing to reemploy her immediately following her honorable discharge from the United States Army. The facts are not in dispute and the case is presently before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment.

Summary judgment is appropriate only where no genuine issue of material fact remains to be decided and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Willetts v. Ford Motor Co., 583 F.2d 852, 855 (6th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wriggelsworth v. BrumbaughDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API