Legal Opinion

Enid Bank & Trust Co. v. Noll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1938No. 28346PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAYLESS, V. C. J.

Kate Noll brought an action in the nature of replevin in the district court of Garfield county, Okla,, against the Enid Bank & Trust Company, a banking corporation, and O. J. Fleming, to regain possession of an unsecured note and a note and mortgage. The unsecured note is the only property now involved. Two other banking corporations intervened claiming title to the note. Judgment was for the plaintiff, and the banks appeal.

Plaintiff’s petition is in the form of an affidavit of replevin. The defendant and interveners claimed to be innocent purchasers of the note. The evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Olson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Pease v. GolightlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Olson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Sigler v. HidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fareed M. Farha v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Farha v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Walden v. Automobile Brokers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API