Hall v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FUTEY, Judge.
Before the Court is a dispute over the extent of court leave to which certain federal employees are entitled. Under the federal court leave statute, qualifying employees who are “summoned ... by a court ... to serve” as jurors are entitled to paid leave for the duration of their service. 5 U.S.C. § 6322(a) (2006). Plaintiff, Dawn Hall, claims entitlement to such leave for service on a year-long panel of the Ventura County Grand Jury (“the Grand Jury”) as a juror, a position for which she had applied and been selected. The government asserts that section 6322(a)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012