Legal Opinion

Hall v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 21, 2011No. 09-239CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

Before the Court is a dispute over the extent of court leave to which certain federal employees are entitled. Under the federal court leave statute, qualifying employees who are “summoned ... by a court ... to serve” as jurors are entitled to paid leave for the duration of their service. 5 U.S.C. § 6322(a) (2006). Plaintiff, Dawn Hall, claims entitlement to such leave for service on a year-long panel of the Ventura County Grand Jury (“the Grand Jury”) as a juror, a position for which she had applied and been selected. The government asserts that section 6322(a)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  3. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API