Herbert v. Sandia Savings & Loan Association
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiff brought suit for damages allegedly arising from a breach of contract by defendants in terminating plaintiff’s employment by defendants. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered pursuant to a motion under District Court Rule 41(b) [§ 21-1-1(41) (b), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, 1970)]. We affirm.
This case was tried to the district court without a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court sustained defendants’ motion made pursuant to District Court Rule 41(b), supra. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and entered by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Komadina v. EdmondsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Hutchison v. BoneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Hickman v. MylanderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. MenkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Daddow v. Carlsbad Municipal School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Garcia v. American Furniture Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Walker v. L.G. Everist, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.