Daddow v. Carlsbad Municipal School District
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
Catherine Daddow appeals from a judgment dismissing her complaint in favor of the Carlsbad Municipal School District and the Carlsbad Municipal Board of Education (hereinafter collectively called “the District”). Daddow brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), alleging denial of due process and stating a cause of action for breach of employment contract and wrongful termination. After a bench trial, the court concluded that the District could not be sued under § 1983, that the District did not breach Daddow’s employment contract by wrongfully terminating her,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Duke v. Grady Municipal SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Ettenson v. BurkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hunt v. Central Consolidated School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Kirchmann v. Lake Elsinore Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Gonzales v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.